![Nikon D2x 14 years later. Is it still relevant? A top pro camera for under $200. | Matt-Jaskulski.com Nikon D2x 14 years later. Is it still relevant? A top pro camera for under $200. | Matt-Jaskulski.com](https://i1.wp.com/matt-jaskulski.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/DSC_3851.jpg?fit=1200%2C903)
Nikon D2x 14 years later. Is it still relevant? A top pro camera for under $200. | Matt-Jaskulski.com
![Nikon D2x 14 years later. Is it still relevant? A top pro camera for under $200. | Matt-Jaskulski.com Nikon D2x 14 years later. Is it still relevant? A top pro camera for under $200. | Matt-Jaskulski.com](https://i0.wp.com/matt-jaskulski.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/DSC_3874.jpg)
Nikon D2x 14 years later. Is it still relevant? A top pro camera for under $200. | Matt-Jaskulski.com
![Nikon D2x 14 years later. Is it still relevant? A top pro camera for under $200. | Matt-Jaskulski.com Nikon D2x 14 years later. Is it still relevant? A top pro camera for under $200. | Matt-Jaskulski.com](https://i0.wp.com/matt-jaskulski.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/DSC_3856.jpg)
Nikon D2x 14 years later. Is it still relevant? A top pro camera for under $200. | Matt-Jaskulski.com
![Használt Nikon fényképezőgépek, objektívek és vakuk - tesztek és vélemények: Használt Nikon D2 széria teszt - vélemény Használt Nikon fényképezőgépek, objektívek és vakuk - tesztek és vélemények: Használt Nikon D2 széria teszt - vélemény](http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-GTizzJ1BrC0/UBO4fnTqNWI/AAAAAAAAAHI/ia4u2y2tHYo/s1600/hasznalt+Nikon+D2X.jpg)